Skip to main content

Book review: Newton and the Counterfeiter


I really enjoyed this book- it was only about 250 pages long, so I whizzed through it. (Well, relatively- it took about a week). It describes the (relatively brief) conflict between Isaac Newton and William Chaloner.

I knew shamefully little about Newton before starting this book (other than the obvious 'scientist who thought up gravity when an apple landed on his head'.) The book describes his early life, and rise to fame as a scientist. (Apples are barely mentioned). Later in life, he was appointed Warden of the Royal Mint, at a time when England's coinage was debased and in need of re-minting. Part of his role as Warden was to chase down anyone who was counterfeiting coins- this was punishable by death, as it was considered treason against the monarch (whose face was on the coinage). Thus, Newton came into conflict with counterfeiter William Chaloner, who first came to London as a runaway apprentice, trying to make his fortune.
(One of my favourite parts of the book was the description of London- it reminded me of Terry Pratchett's description of Ankh Morpork in the Discworld books. I'd always assumed that he'd based that on London, but this is the first description of London that I have read which is as vivid as the description of Ankh Morpork).

Chaloner's character and motivations were less well fleshed out (and thus less interesting) than Newton's- for the simple reason that there is much less evidence of Chaloner's life- Newton seems to have left behind acres of writing.

Comments

  1. Reading a short book on a very particular incident in history is a good approach. The last history book I read (The Elizabethans) was very sweeping in scope!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely find it easier to get to grips with a period of history when I read a biography- I can get a bit lost in sweeping histories, trying to remember who everyone is!

      Delete
  2. I'm so glad I found someone else who related this book to Ankh-Morpork! I've written my review here: http://www.michalpaszkiewicz.co.uk/blog/reviewnewtonatc/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2014 aims and review of 2013 aims

After all of the Christmas feasting (the fridge is still full of cheese, and sprouts that didn't get cooked), and despite the first cold of the winter, I am feeling the urge to get cracking with some projects, and finish up all of those little lingering jobs that I've been putting off. One of those is to work out what I am aiming to achieve this year...and this is what I have come up with: - complete first module of C&G knitting course and start second. Save enough money to pay the course fees for the whole course. - donate 2% (minimum) of earnings to charity. I am planning to donate at the end of each month, and to donate to a variety of causes, local, international, animals, people, conservation- hopefully a wide variety. - read down the house- I'd like to read 12 books this year, which would leave quite a few books unread. But it'd be nice to establish the habit of reading again. - reduce stash of knitting yarn from just under 40,000 metres to under 30,000 m

Belated round-up

Having just re-read my 2014 aims post , and noticed that I intended to write a monthly round up of my progress, I thought it was about time for, err, a three-and-a-half monthly progress summary! - C&G knitting course- I have made slow progress on this- although slow is better than none! I have at least written out a giant list of what I need to do to finish the module so that I can have the satisfaction of ticking things off said list. I've knitted a few more samples and written up the notes on them. I think I need to focus more on this aim, if I am to actually finish the module this year. I seem to have a bit of mental block about it though, and I am not sure why. - donate 2% of earnings to charity. I have been doing this, although more by sponsoring people for the London Marathon and joining the National Trust than by picking a charity each month and donating to it, which is what I originally envisaged. I am wondering if donating less often, say every six months, would b